The Nation-Published on Nov 30, 2002
The following is former deputy foreign minister MR Sukhumbhand Paribatra's
presentation to the conference on "Burma: Reconciliation in Myanmar and
the Crisis of Change", organised by the Paul Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies, the Johns Hopkins University's Southeast Asia Studies
Programme, in Washington DC on November 22-23.
Nowadays, when I am participating in a gathering such as this, I feel
rather awkward. I am neither fish nor fowl, neither fauna nor flora, neither a
part of government nor completely divorced from it. Therefore, I am not sure
how best to conduct myself. Given this "identity crisis", perhaps it
might be better for me, instead of providing a deep and learned analysis of
what is happening in Burma (that is, assuming I am capable of doing so), to
relate my personal experiences to this distinguished audience.
I have been dreaming a lot recently; in fact, I have been dreaming on nine
successive nights, a number which happens to be astrologically auspicious for
Asians.
On the first night, I dreamed that Burma is at peace with herself.
I dreamed that a successful process of national reconciliation has taken
place, not only between the SPDC and the NLD, but also between the present
government and all the minorities, and that this process has brought about a
much more open and representative system of politics and governance,
characterised by respect of human rights, the rule of law, accountability,
freedom and participation.
And I woke up a happy man.
For such national reconciliation would mean that the people of Burma are no
longer fighting and killing one another, that now they all have a chance to
work together to develop their society and economy, and that they can end
their country's isolation and begin to make use of the international
community's resources in their pursuit of a better life.
On the second night, I dreamed that Burma was at peace with the world.
I dreamed that national reconciliation has brought about conditions conducive
to greater cooperation, both between Burma and the international community and
between her and her neighbours, particularly her historic adversary, Thailand.
And I woke up a happy man.
I was happy because for so long I have wanted the ordinary people of Burma to
enjoy the fruits of mankind's economic, scientific and technological
development. For long I have wanted the ordinary people of Burma to have
opportunities to interact with their peers in neighbouring lands, so that they
can all learn from, as well as learn to cooperate with, one another. And for
long I have wanted Burma and Thailand to turn their backs to the past and
their faces to a common future.
Like 60 million other Thais, I was not born when the mighty Burmese army burnt
Ayuddhya to ashes 240 years ago.
On the third night, I dreamed that Burma is turning swords into ploughshares.
I dreamed that her leaders at long last recognised the anomaly whereby one of
the world's poorest countries had one of the largest standing armies and some
of the most advanced weaponry in Pacific Asia, and began to reduce both the
defence budget and the number of men at arms.
I dreamed that Burma is about to sell their MIG-29s back to Russia and that
Russia is willing to buy them back.
And I woke up a happy man.
I felt happy for the ordinary people of Burma who will have more money spent
on directly improving their extraordinarily difficult lives. And I felt happy
for the ordinary people of Thailand, for our leaders will no longer have any
clear and pressing rationale to buy more F-15s or revive their interest in
purchasing F-18s, which would simply add a considerably greater burden to the
rapidly escalating public debt.
On the fourth night, I dreamed that Burma has become a good regional partner,
with a good sense of regional responsibility.
I dreamed that Burma is working very closely with her Asean partners to
realise Asean's "Vision 2020", especially where the dream of having
"caring societies" is concerned. I also dreamed that she is
cooperating with her neighbours in resolving specific problems, which may have
roots in one country's domestic conditions but have transnational, regional or
international consequences, such as drugs, HIV/ Aids, migration, and trade in
women and children.
And I woke up a happy man.
I felt happy for Asean because Burma is an important country and her
commitment to the cause of regionalism can only make Asean stronger. I felt
happy for all the ordinary peoples living on both sides of the Burmese-Thai
border, whose livelihoods are no longer interrupted by abrupt border closures.
I felt happy for the women and children, whose lives have become more secure.
And I felt happy for the ordinary people of Thailand, whose government can now
concentrate its efforts on addressing the demand side of the drug equation and
no longer has an excuse not to achieve greater success in its war against this
evil threat to humanity.
On the fifth night, I dreamed that Burma, while maintaining close ties with
China, has good relations with all the major powers.
And I woke up a happy man.
For, while cooperation with China is a must and will be increasingly important
in the years ahead, I have always considered a balanced foreign policy
essential for the Asean countries, both individually and collectively:
essential for maximising benefits and minimising costs in participating in
global affairs; essential for restoring the bargaining power of Asean as a
diplomatic community; and essential for building up the role of Asean as a
force of reason and moderation in the international community, which may
become more and more polarised by international terrorism and the West's
responses to the threat thereof.
On the sixth night, I dreamed that Burma plays a proactive and constructive
role in the international arena, both on her own and in collaboration with her
Asean partners.
And I woke up a happy man.
For it means that Burma, the quality of whose foreign service is second to
none in the region, is beginning to fulfil her diplomatic potential, which
must be good news for both Asean and the international community.
On the seventh night, I dreamed that Burma is the next "Tiger" of
Pacific Asia.
I dreamed that progress made in the development of Burma's tremendous human
and natural resources, together with those of the three Indochinese countries,
is helpful to push Southeast Asia once more to the forefront of the world's
economic success stories.
I dreamed that an economically strong Burma can both act as a bridge between
Asean and South Asia and help transform Southeast Asia into a bridge between
China and India.
And I woke up a happy man.
On the eighth night, I dreamed that an economically strong Burma and an
economically strong Thailand are becoming increasingly integrated through
expanding ties of trade, investment and financial transactions, through the
construction of a multiplicity of communication, telecommunication and
transportation linkages, through the sharing of power grids, water resources
and information technologies, and through the free movement of and exchanges
among the peoples of the two countries.
And I woke up a happy man.
No more burning of Ayudhya.
On the last night, I dreamed that all these dreams are true. Then I woke up
very unhappy indeed, when I realised that these dreams were just that . . . .
dreams, not realities.
MR Sukhumbhand Paribatra
Burma
Today do not take any responsibility for news content. Copyrights of news
articles remain with the respective news agencies or reporter[s].
