|
| |

 |
|
"Given the
violations of basic human rights and the current political and social
turmoil there, production in Burma is inconsistent with our Company's
values." --Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., upon announcing
it would no longer sell goods from Burma
"It is not possible to do business in
[Burma] without directly supporting the military government and its
pervasive violations of human rights." --Levi-Strauss & Co.
upon withdrawing from Burma
|
Burmese garment exports to the United States have recently skyrocketed. Since
1995, apparel imports to the United States from Burma have grown by 800%,
shooting up 85% in the first quarter of 2001 alone. Total imports from Burma
are nearly $500 million a year! Even though 31 companies, including
Wal-Mart, Tommy Hilfiger, Jones New York, and Ames refuse to sell goods from
Burma, Some
U.S. and Canadian companies, are sourcing, licensing, and/or
retailing goods made in Burma.
Based on eyewitness observations, we believe that The Children's Place Retail
Stores, Inc. may be selling a greater percentage of goods from Burma than
any other company in the United States. We find it extremely cynical that a
company like The Children's Place, that sells goods for children, would
help to support Burma's military regime, which is notorious for its use of
forced and bonded child labor. Until they stop selling goods from Burma, we call
for a complete boycott of The Children's Place.
Apparel Trade, Military Regime, and Forced Labor

According to members of
the military regime itself, (see how BBC
captured this on video) garment/apparel companies are controlled by Burma's
brutal military regime, a dictatorship that the U.S. State Department, United
Nations (UN), Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International say commits vicious
human rights violations, including forced labor on scale perhpas unparalleled in
the rest of the world.
Moreover, according to the U.S.
Department of Commerce Country Commercial Guide 2002, Burma's military junta
charges a tax of 10% on the value of all exports. This means the regime is
probably literally making tens of millions of dollars per year from goods
shipped to America alone! As if that weren't bad enough, only banks run by the
regime have been allowed to handle foreign exchange transactions. There is
evidence that these banks use this foreign exchange for the regime's own
spending.
The Burmese people
themselves want these companies to stop doing business in Burma. 1991 Nobel
Peace Prize winner Aung
San Suu Kyi has stated repeatedly that international corporations should
stay out of Burma for the time being. For this reason, South Africa's 1984 Nobel
Peace Prize recipient Archibishop Desmond Tutu, who led the effort to impose
sanctions on South Africa in the 1980s, has compared Burma to South Africa's
freedom struggle: "...during those hours when hope
was fragile, we were strengthened by the support of our brothers and sisters
around the world. Sanctions were imposed, governments and citizens worked hard
against the regime, and my people are now free. Burma is the next South
Africa."
Regime's Abuse of the Burmese People

From 1996-1998, the International Labor
Organization, an agency of the United Nations, conducted an exhausitve
investigation into forced labor in Burma, where it found "a saga of untold
misery and suffering, oppression and exploitation of large sections of the
population inhabiting Myanmar [Burma] by the Government, military and other
public officers." The U.S. Department of Labor has said that
"millions" of Burmese have been pressed into forced labor in Burma.
The U.S.
State Department's Burma Country Report on Human Rights 2001, released on
March 4, 2002, says: "Forced labor, including forced child labor, has
contributed materially to the construction of industrial parks subsequently used
largely to produce manufactured exports, including garments."
Put simply, it is impossible to do business in Burma without supporting the
regime and its brutal violations
of human rights.
Courtesy: Free Burma Coalition
Burmatoday
do not take any responsibility for news content. Copyrights of news articles
remain with the respective news agencies or reporter[s].

|