People's militias, army to be trained
to defend against "foreign threat"
DVB ( July18,2003 )
It is reported that Rangoon military HQs has set up the 21st
of July as the beginning day of military trainings for People’s
Army [militia] against the enemy without. In a directive,
the families of soldiers throughout the country and militia
members from villages and wards are told to simultaneously
take part in basic military and firearms handling trainings
from the 21st of July for a month.
According to a local resident in Mandalay, 25 people from
each of the 16 wards of Maha Aungmye Township have been given
military training for two days and seven people from each
of the 28 wards of Aungmye Thazan Township have been trained
since the full moon day [13 July] of Waso.
The training ground is near the No.9, State High School and
the trainees have to attend the courses every evening from
six to seven o’clock. The recruiting duties are given
by local township authorities to their subordinates, according
to the local residents.
In Taungoo, Pegu Division, seven people from each ward are
being recruited for military trainings but it is not known
when the trainings are going to begin, according to local
residents there.
Impact of US sanctions felt; UN Security Council involvement
viewed
We have learned that within days of the import ban legislation
passed by the two houses of the United States Congress, many
factories in Hlaingthaya of Rangoon Division have already
closed down.
According to Rangoon residents, factory workers have been
given salaries for three months and told to take their time
off.
To find out the situation in Rangoon following the action
by the United States, we contacted U Khun Tun Oo, a company
owner as well as a leader of ethnic nationalities, for his
comments.
U Khun Tun Oo : There is bound to be an impact and some will
be hurt presently. What is important is who will be hurt and
what will be the consequences, and we will have to wait and
see. Presently, factories had to be closed down but the workers
are not feeling the full impact as yet because they have been
given salary for three months. And, since the Bill has not
come into force yet, some have kept their factories open,
at least for the time being. Once the Bill is signed into
law, there will definitely be an impact.
That was U Khun Tun Oo, chairman of the Shan Nationalities
League for Democracy.
Meanwhile, in his interview, Dr Thaung Htun, UN representative
for the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma
[in exile], explained the significance of the economic sanction
by the United States and the connection it has to the discussions
underway in the United Nations Security Council.
Dr Thaung Htun : The main reason for our efforts to get sanctions
imposed is to weaken the economic base of the SPDC [State
Peace and Development Council]. In previous years, exports
from Burma to the United States amounted to about 400m dollars,
and the bulk of this amount goes into the coffers of the SPDC.
By passing the legislation, we will be able to block this
400m dollars from going to the SPDC.
Also, the entire US Congress is in support of bringing the
case of Burma before the UN Security Council. With regard
to the economic sanctions against Burma, the US Congress wants
to see the international community, particularly the UN Security
Council, to cooperate and take effective action.
We have learned that the US representative to the United
Nations took the lead in discussing Burma at the UN Security
Council meeting on Thursday [16 July]. Britain and France
also voiced their opinions in support of the United States.
Russia, however, said that the question of Burma was a matter
that only concerned the UN General Assembly and had nothing
to do with the UN Security Council.
What was remarkable, however, was that the Chinese representative,
who most had thought would use his veto power, just sat there
listening without making any comments.
We also asked U Khun Tun Oo whether the increase in international
pressure would make the SPDC talk to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi
or make it more intransigent, he said:
U Khun Tun Oo : Personally, I think they would consider how
to successfully revive the talks. This is because you mentioned
the UN Security Council in your question. Once the UN Security
Council gets involved there isn't much left to do. As you
had said, prospects cannot be too good for the SPDC. Personally,
I think the talks must be resumed. I have said this many times
before too.
(BBC Monitoring service)
|